FAQs About RG58 and LMR-195
Your Burning Questions, Answered
Q: Can I use RG58 for a long Wi-Fi antenna run?
A: Technically, you can, but you really shouldn’t. At 2.4 GHz, RG58 has significant signal loss, especially for runs longer than 15-20 feet. You’ll likely see a massive drop in performance and range. LMR-195 is a much better choice for this application because its low attenuation will preserve more of your signal strength, giving you a stronger, more reliable connection. Think of RG58 as the budget option for very short distances, not for a long-haul solution.
Q: Is LMR-195 a direct replacement for RG58?
A: Yes and no. LMR-195 is a superior-performing cable with similar physical dimensions, so it can often be used in place of RG58 to improve performance. However, you must use connectors designed for LMR-195, and you should be aware that it’s slightly less flexible. It’s an upgrade, not a one-to-one identical twin. You wouldn’t put a V8 engine in a sedan and expect it to handle exactly the same, would you? The performance is better, but the handling characteristics are different.
Q: What is the main advantage of LMR-195 over RG58?
A: The single biggest advantage is its **low attenuation**, which means less signal loss over distance. This is crucial for high-frequency applications (like Wi-Fi, GPS, and cellular) and for any run where signal strength is a concern. The construction of LMR-195, with its solid center conductor, foam dielectric, and double shielding, makes it vastly more efficient at preserving signal integrity. It’s the difference between having a strong, clear signal and a weak, noisy one.